Radiologist – patient interaction

Radiologist – patient interaction

Ultrasonologists interact with their patients, which is why after a certain number of years, they can actually create a “direct” practice, without referrals.

For those who work with X-rays, CT scan, MRI and PET, the patient interaction, especially after the study is done and when it comes to communicating the report is very limited. Perhaps, the time has come to address this? To actually build in some consultation time if patients want to discuss the findings on their scans?

Brittle Bones, Late Diagnosis

I received a call about 4 months ago from a family physician, who wanted me to perform a USG or CT guided biopsy for a mass in the anterior compartment of the right thigh in a 47-years old woman. He did not give me any more details and said the patient would get in touch with me.

I forgot about this, until a month later, when I was going through some histopathology reports of biopsies done by my ultrasonologist and chanced upon a report that described a hemangiopericytoma in the thigh with a comment saying that this was consistent with a phospaturic mesenchymal tumor.

Image

Fig. 1: Ultrasound shows the mass in the anterior compartment of the right thigh (red arrow) with the biopsy needle (blue arrow)

I called for more details and then realized that this was the same patient that the family physician, a month ago, had called about. Different people in our department do ultrasound and CT-guided biopsies and the patient went straight to the ultrasonologist, who in turn, went ahead and performed a core biopsy of the mass in the anterior compartment of the thigh (Fig. 1).

A phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor is a rare condition and typically secretes FGF-23 (fibroblastic growth factor) that produces osteomalacia. This combination is called oncogenic osteomalacia or tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO).

I then asked the patient to get all the reports and details.

Image

Fig. 2: Radiograph shows an insufficiency fracture (arrow) of the base of the proximal right 3rd metatarsal bone.

Image

Fig. 3: Radiograph shows an insufficiency fracture (arrow) of the mid-left 5th metatarsal bone.

It had taken 5 years to get to this diagnosis. She started with an insufficiency fracture, five years ago, in the right 3rd metatarsal bone (Fig. 2), followed a month later by another fracture in the left 5th metatarsal bone (Fig. 3). She received symptomatic treatment and went from doctor to doctor with variable diagnoses of osteoporosis and perhaps osteomalacia.

This went on for 4 years, until one day, she was unable to get up from bed. She was admitted to a hospital and a skeletal survey showed fractures of the necks of both humeri (Fig. 5) and femurs (Fig. 6) with biconcave vertebrae (Fig. 7). Finally she received a diagnosis of osteomalacia and was worked up.

Her serum calcium was normal, vitamin D was normal, serum phosphorus was very low and her 24-hours urine phosphorus was elevated with a normal serum parathormone level and a raised serum alkaline phosphatase level. She did not fit into vitamin D related causes or phosphate deficiency conditions and what was left was a potential diagnosis of oncogenic osteomalacia.

Fig 4

Fig. 4: Radiographs of both shoulders show fractures (red arrows) of the necks of both humeri

Fig 5

Fig. 5: Radiograph of the bones of the pelvis and both hips show fractures (red arrows) of the necks of both femurs.

Lateral radiograph of the spine shows biconcave vertebrae

Fig. 6: Lateral radiograph of the spine shows biconcave vertebrae

Thus started the search for an FGF-secreting tumor that produces phosphaturia, hypophosphatemia and osteomalacia. A PET/CT then showed a mass with low FDG uptake in the anterior compartment of the thigh (Fig. 7), which was then biopsied. The common tumors that produce FGF are hemangiopericytoma, hemangioma, giant cell tumor and non-ossifying fibroma.

Contrast enhanced CT scan shows a hypervascular lesion (arrow) in the anterior compartment of right thigh, with mild FDG uptake (arrow) on the PET study.

Fig. 7: Contrast enhanced CT scan shows a hypervascular lesion (arrow) in the anterior compartment of right thigh, with mild FDG uptake (arrow) on the PET study.

She was operated and the tumor removed. Most patients show dramatic recovery of their phosphorus levels, but the skeletal changes and fractures take time to heal. The patient is slowly getting better symptomatically.

The most common reason for delayed diagnosis (in her case 5 years with an average time of 4.7 years from start of symptoms to final diagnosis) is due to lack of awareness and the inability to find the tumor.

This case was recently presented by our DNB resident Dr. Parang Sanghavi in the Teaching Files Case Presentation meeting in Mumbai, where it won the first prize in the 3rd year residents’ category.

Tea and Fluorosis

Tea and Fluorosis

Who would have thought that drinking tea can produced fluorosis. In keeping with the theme of this blog, this short story / report about a patient who developed fluorosis after drinking copious amounts of tea (yes, tea), everyday is extremely interesting.

How Fast is a Fast Response

This is a 29-years old lady who has a 4-months old child. A month after her pregnancy, she started getting some backache and chest pain and was feeling lethargic. She saw her family physician, who attributed all her symptoms and signs to post-pregnancy related issues and put her on standard symptomatic treatment, including vitamin D3 and B12 supplementation.

She did not improve and went to another family physician, who did not take her seriously as well and so she changed to a third family physician.

This last physician was concerned. She had been having fever and basic tests showed a raised ESR. According to him, she “did not look well”. He ordered a Mantoux and a CT scan of the chest both at the same time.

Her CT scan done on Mar 15, 2013, showed enlarged necrotic mediastinal nodes (Fig. 1), pericardial effusion and thickening (Figs. 1,2) and pleural effusions bilaterally (Figs. 2, 3).

Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan shows enlarged necrotic subcarinal and right hilar lymph nodes (red arrows) and pericardial effusion (blue arrow)

Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan shows enlarged necrotic subcarinal and right hilar lymph nodes (red arrows) and pericardial effusion (blue arrow)

Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan shows pericardial effusion (blue arrow) with thickening with left pleural effusion (white arrow)

Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan shows pericardial effusion (blue arrow) with thickening with left pleural effusion (white arrow)

Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan shows bilateral pleural effusions (white arrows)

Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan shows bilateral pleural effusions (white arrows)

She was asked to see a chest physician immediately. Her family came to see me and I advised the same.

In the mean time her Mantoux came strongly positive.

The chest physician started her immediately on first-line anti-tuberculous therapy with steroids for the pericardial effusion. Given the high incidence of primary multi-drug resistant tuberculosis in our country, he cautioned them that in case she did not improve clinically, she would need a CT guided subcarinal node biopsy and she was asked to see me again if that situation were to arise. There was no way to confirm the diagnosis at this time. The pleural fluid was too little and was unlikely to yield any results.

The next day, they called me and insisted on getting the biopsy done. Their reasoning was logical – they wanted to confirm the diagnosis and get material for culture and be sure that she was sensitive to first-line drugs. It is rare to find patients and families with such sensibilities.

I checked with the chest physician who agreed. If a patient wants a biopsy for confirmation, that is a request to be respected.

I posted her for a biopsy on 22 Mar, 2013. After standard counseling and explanations, I positioned her in the prone position to perform an extrapleural, CT guided subcarinal node biopsy. Lo and behold! The preliminary scans showed that the node had mildly regressed in size, the pleural effusions had regressed and the pericardial effusion had partly regressed.

I immediately called in the relatives and had the patient turn over and sit up. I explained to them that the partial regression meant response to treatment and that it made no sense to perform the biopsy at this point in time. They too agreed…they were so happy and relieved…these are the times when it is so gratifying to be a physician advising a patient. I repeated another contrast enhanced CT to document these findings (Figs. 4-6).

Axial contrast enhanced CT scans of 15 Mar and 22 Mar show partial regression of the subcarinal node.

Axial contrast enhanced CT scans of 15 Mar and 22 Mar show partial regression of the subcarinal node.

Axial contrast enhanced CT scans of 15 Mar and 22 Mar show partial regression of the pericardial effusion.

Axial contrast enhanced CT scans of 15 Mar and 22 Mar show partial regression of the pericardial effusion.

Axial contrast enhanced CT scans of 15 Mar and 22 Mar show complete regression of the pleural effusions.

Axial contrast enhanced CT scans of 15 Mar and 22 Mar show complete regression of the pleural effusions.

This is one of the fastest and quickest responses to tuberculosis that I have encountered.

Update 1:

A query on Facebook where I had posted this article asked whether there is an increased incidence of tuberculosis in the post-partum period. There is and this Pubmed link has the data.

%d bloggers like this: